Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton engaged in a substantive debate on various pressing issues ahead of the May 3 federal election.

The debate, hosted in Parramatta, western Sydney, involved 100 undecided voters who posed questions on a range of topics, including energy policy, cost-of-living pressures, and the current situation in Gaza.

In his opening remarks, Albanese emphasized the importance of progressing forward, asserting that now is not the time to reverse policies that have been implemented by his government.

In contrast, Dutton criticized the current administration's economic performance, claiming that under Labor, Australia’s economy has regressed.

A focal point of contention was Australia's energy transition.

Dutton urged voters to remember Labor's previous commitment to reducing energy bills by $275, questioning why electricity costs had actually risen by $1,300.

Albanese challenged Dutton on the financial viability of the Coalition's plan to introduce seven nuclear reactors, asking how such a significant investment would be financed.

In his response, Dutton pointed to the extended lifespan of nuclear energy, suggesting that costs could be amortized over time and emphasizing his support for increasing gas supply as a means to stimulate electricity generation.

Cost-of-living concerns were palpable among the audience, with many participants indicating they were financially strained when asked by the debate moderator, Kieran Gilbert.

Dutton described this acknowledgment as a “confronting” moment.

Both parties are proposing measures to alleviate financial burdens: Labor is advocating for further power bill relief and modest tax cuts, while the Coalition has pledged to halve fuel excise for 12 months, resulting in a 25-cent-per-litre reduction in petrol prices.

The debate also touched upon international issues, specifically the ongoing conflict in Gaza.

Both leaders expressed a desire for peace, recognizing the emotional toll on Australians with familial ties to the region.

Albanese stated the necessity of a ceasefire and emphasized that all human life is valuable, urging for the release of hostages and the facilitation of humanitarian aid to Gaza.

Dutton defended Israel's military actions, suggesting that any similar situation for Australians would warrant a strong governmental response.

Migration policy emerged as another significant discussion point, particularly following a question regarding the portrayal of migrants during political discourse.

While Dutton acknowledged the value of Australia’s diverse migrant history, he maintained that a well-managed migration program is essential and reiterated his party's intent to reduce immigration by 25 percent.

The question of respectful dialogue surrounding migration rhetoric was not directly addressed by Dutton.

Early assessments from the audience indicated a preference for Albanese, with 44 out of 100 voters declaring him the winner of the debate, compared to 35 votes for Dutton and 21 remaining undecided.

This early sentiment reflected a favorable view of Albanese's confidence and clarity regarding policy details.