United States Vetoes UN Resolution for Ceasefire in Gaza
The US decision halts a call for an immediate ceasefire and poses significant implications for the humanitarian crisis in the region.
The United States has utilized its veto power in the United Nations Security Council to reject a resolution that called for an "immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire" between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas, along with unhindered access for humanitarian aid across the Gaza Strip.
Acting US ambassador to the UN, Dorothy Shea, articulated that the decision was driven by the resolution's failure to explicitly condemn Hamas and its refusal to demand the disarmament of the group.
Shea emphasized that supporting such a measure would weaken ongoing diplomatic efforts while potentially emboldening Hamas.
The veto positioned the United States as the only nation among the council's 15 members to oppose the draft resolution, which had received backing from the other 14 members.
Israel, facing external pressures for a ceasefire, has consistently rejected unconditional calls for peace, asserting that Hamas cannot remain in control of Gaza.
The region has endured renewed military operations following the termination of a two-month ceasefire earlier in March.
Recent reports from Gaza health officials indicate that Israeli airstrikes resulted in the deaths of 45 Palestinians on a Wednesday, with one Israeli soldier also reported to have died in conflict that same day.
Aid agencies warn that the humanitarian situation is rapidly deteriorating, affecting over two million residents in Gaza, where famine conditions are a looming threat.
Since May 19, when an 11-week blockade was lifted, aid has been significantly limited.
In response to the escalating situation, several aid distribution sites in Gaza have been temporarily shut.
The Global Humanitarian Forum (GHF) has engaged with the Israeli military to better manage civilian movement near military positions, advocating for clearer guidance aimed at minimizing misunderstandings and escalation risks.
Reports indicate that more than 80 individuals were fatally shot by Israeli forces in a three-day span, with clashes occurring near aid distribution points.
Local witnesses claim that encounters with Israeli troops resulted in fatal shootings on Tuesday, during which crowds gathered before dawn in search of food.
The Israeli military has refuted claims of indiscriminate fire, stating that shots were directed at individuals perceived as threats who had disregarded warnings.
A spokesman for GHF reiterated that the organization is focused on safeguarding the safety and dignity of civilians receiving assistance.
In a shift to address the aid distribution crisis, a new model has been initiated, utilizing just three designated sites for aid distribution—a process that has faced criticism from the UN and various humanitarian organizations for its militarized approach.
The ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip, which reignited in October 2023 following a Hamas attack that resulted in 1,200 Israeli fatalities and the abduction of approximately 250 hostages, has led to a reported casualty figure exceeding 54,000 Palestinians, as reported by Gaza health authorities.
Acting US ambassador to the UN, Dorothy Shea, articulated that the decision was driven by the resolution's failure to explicitly condemn Hamas and its refusal to demand the disarmament of the group.
Shea emphasized that supporting such a measure would weaken ongoing diplomatic efforts while potentially emboldening Hamas.
The veto positioned the United States as the only nation among the council's 15 members to oppose the draft resolution, which had received backing from the other 14 members.
Israel, facing external pressures for a ceasefire, has consistently rejected unconditional calls for peace, asserting that Hamas cannot remain in control of Gaza.
The region has endured renewed military operations following the termination of a two-month ceasefire earlier in March.
Recent reports from Gaza health officials indicate that Israeli airstrikes resulted in the deaths of 45 Palestinians on a Wednesday, with one Israeli soldier also reported to have died in conflict that same day.
Aid agencies warn that the humanitarian situation is rapidly deteriorating, affecting over two million residents in Gaza, where famine conditions are a looming threat.
Since May 19, when an 11-week blockade was lifted, aid has been significantly limited.
In response to the escalating situation, several aid distribution sites in Gaza have been temporarily shut.
The Global Humanitarian Forum (GHF) has engaged with the Israeli military to better manage civilian movement near military positions, advocating for clearer guidance aimed at minimizing misunderstandings and escalation risks.
Reports indicate that more than 80 individuals were fatally shot by Israeli forces in a three-day span, with clashes occurring near aid distribution points.
Local witnesses claim that encounters with Israeli troops resulted in fatal shootings on Tuesday, during which crowds gathered before dawn in search of food.
The Israeli military has refuted claims of indiscriminate fire, stating that shots were directed at individuals perceived as threats who had disregarded warnings.
A spokesman for GHF reiterated that the organization is focused on safeguarding the safety and dignity of civilians receiving assistance.
In a shift to address the aid distribution crisis, a new model has been initiated, utilizing just three designated sites for aid distribution—a process that has faced criticism from the UN and various humanitarian organizations for its militarized approach.
The ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip, which reignited in October 2023 following a Hamas attack that resulted in 1,200 Israeli fatalities and the abduction of approximately 250 hostages, has led to a reported casualty figure exceeding 54,000 Palestinians, as reported by Gaza health authorities.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
