Australia has underscored the importance of international law, regional stability and diplomatic engagement in response to the dramatic U.S. military operation that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife.

The operation, ordered by U.S. President Donald Trump and executed by American forces in Caracas in early January, marked a significant escalation in tensions between Washington and Caracas and has drawn varied reactions around the world.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese articulated Canberra’s position, urging all parties to prioritise dialogue, diplomacy and respect for legal norms to prevent further instability in Latin America.

He reiterated Australia’s longstanding support for democratic principles, human rights and peaceful transition processes in Venezuela, emphasising that any change in leadership must reflect the will of the Venezuelan people.

The Australian government has also issued travel advisories urging citizens to avoid travel to Venezuela amid unpredictable security conditions.

The raid has sparked debate within Australia’s political landscape.

The Liberal–National Coalition welcomed Maduro’s removal, framing it as a stand against authoritarianism and severe governance failures in Venezuela.

Conversely, the Greens have characterised the U.S. operation as a breach of international law and expressed concern that such unilateral actions may undermine established global legal frameworks.

Australasian Venezuelan communities have also voiced differing perspectives, with some celebrating the end of Maduro’s rule and others urging caution and respect for Venezuela’s sovereignty.

The significance of the U.S. action for Australia extends beyond bilateral foreign policy.

Experts note that Australia’s alignment with global partners on democratic values and rule-based order could shape its diplomatic and security engagements as regional dynamics evolve.

Canberra’s response reflects broader concerns about the implications of military interventions for regional stability and international norms, even as the United States defends its actions as part of a campaign against alleged narcotics trafficking and criminal networks.

With international debate intensifying and multinational bodies calling for restraint and legal adherence, Australia’s approach highlights a careful balance between support for democratic outcomes and adherence to the rule of law.